Overview

My app was submitted on 1/27/2026 and is still in "Waiting for Review" with no updates. I submitted a request to Support several days ago with no response to see if there was an issue that needed to be addressed, and my request to schedule an App Review session was denied.

Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if anyone else is experiencing longer-than-usual review times this February. My apps has been in review for a bit longer than normal, so I’m wondering if there are any known delays or if it’s just me. Thanks!

Have tried to join the developer programme and says its still pending after 3 days. Anyone any idea how long the procedure takes??

Hello, We’re facing a long delay with our app review and would appreciate any advice. We submitted our app for review and have been waiting for over 2 weeks with no updates at all — no approval, no rejection, and no request for more information. Since we weren’t sure what was happening, we looked into it and found that sometimes apps can get stuck in the review queue. Based on that, we decided to cancel the submission and submit it again. It has now been 2 more days since resubmitting, and there is still no response or progress. At this point, we’re not sure if this delay is normal or if there might be an issue on our side. App details: App Name: Autoskop Has anyone experienced something similar recently?Is there anything we can do to speed up the process or get clarity from Apple? Thank you.

Hi, I'm investigating what looks like possibly nondeterministic behavior when linking large iOS app binaries. I do not have a concise reproduction of the issue yet, but am trying to hunt down possible leads. In particular, the problem appears to surface when invoking clang to link a binary and the resulting order of the 'branch island' instructions appears to be random each time the binary is linked (as shown by the link map output). I was wondering if anyone with insight into the linker's current implementation could shed light on whether that is expected, and if there is anything that can be done to prevent it. FWIW, it seems like it might be size-dependent as smaller app binaries don't appear to exhibit the same behavior. I'd be glad to share more specifics and hopefully a reproduction if I can ever find one eventually. Some environment info (Xcode 16.4 toolchain): clang -v: Apple clang version 17.0.0 (clang-1700.0.13.5) Target: arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode-16.4.0.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin ld -v: @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld-1167.5 BUILD 01:45:05 Apr 30 2025 configured to support archs: armv6 armv7 armv7s arm64 arm64e arm64_32 i386 x86_64 x86_64h armv6m armv7k armv7m armv7em will use ld-classic for: armv6 armv7 armv7s i386 armv6m armv7k armv7m armv7em LTO support using: LLVM version 17.0.0 (static support for 29, runtime is 29) TAPI support using: Apple TAPI version 17.0.0 (tapi-1700.0.3.5)

I haven’t been able to get this to work at any level! I’m running into multiple issues, any light shed on any of these would be nice: I can’t implement a bloom filter that produces the same output as can be found in the SimpleURLFilter sample project, after following the textual description of it that’s available in the documentation. No clue what my implementation is doing wrong, and because of the nature of hashing, there is no way to know. Specifically: The web is full of implementations of FNV-1a and MurmurHash3, and they all produce different hashes for the same input. Can we get the proper hashes for some sample strings, so we know which is the “correct” one? Similarly, different implementations use different encodings for the strings to hash. Which should we use here? The formulas for numberOfBits and numberOfHashes give Doubles and assign them to Ints. It seems we should do this conversing by rounding them, is this correct? Can we get a sample correct value for the combined hash, so we can verify our implementations against it? Or ignoring all of the above, can we have the actual code instead of a textual description of it? 😓 I managed to get Settings to register my first attempt at this extension in beta 1. Now, in beta 2, any other project (including the sample code) will redirect to Settings, show the Allow/Deny message box, I tap Allow, and then nothing happens. This must be a bug, right? Whenever I try to enable the only extension that Settings accepted (by setting its isEnabled to true), its status goes to .stopped and the error is, of course, .unknown. How do I debug this? While the extension is .stopped, ALL URL LOADS are blocked on the device. Is this to be expected? (shouldFailClosed is set to false) Is there any way to manually reload the bloom filter? My app ships blocklist updates with background push, so it would be wasteful to fetch the filter at a fixed interval. If so, can we opt out of the periodic fetch altogether? I initially believed the API to be near useless because I didn’t know of its “fuzzy matching” capabilities, which I’ve discovered by accident in a forum post. It’d be nice if those were documented somewhere! Thanks!!

We have been using this API call to set the In-App Provisioning capability for 2+ years and it just recently started returning errors. To set the In-App Provisioning capability we had been using the App Store Connect API directly: curl "https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIdCapabilities" -X POST --header "Authorization: Bearer #{appleApiToken}" --header "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"data": {"type": "bundleIdCapabilities", "attributes": {"capabilityType": " IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING"}, "relationships": {"bundleId": {"data": {"id": "#{appStoreBundleIdentifier}", "type": "bundleIds"}}}}}' The IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING capability type is shown, by getting the bundle ID capabilities, when In-App Provisioning is set on a bundle ID: curl "https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIds/#{appStoreBundleIdentifier}/bundleIdCapabilities" --header "Authorization: Bearer #{appleApiToken}" After manually setting the In-App Provisioning capability via the Apple Developer portal you will see the new capabilityType: {     "type" : "bundleIdCapabilities",     "id" : "##########_IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING",     "attributes" : {       "settings" : null,       "capabilityType" : "IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING"     },     "relationships" : {       "bundleId" : {         "links" : {           "self" : "https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIdCapabilities/##########_IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING/relationships/bundleId",           "related" : "https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIdCapabilities/##########_IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING/bundleId"         }       }     },     "links" : {       "self" : "https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIdCapabilities/##########_IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING"     }   } The problem now is Apple has recently (within the last week) removed support for setting the IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING capability type via the bundleIdCapabilities API endpoint. {   "errors" : [ {     "id" : "c6644913-d1c5-4eda-9faa-7766adf25c39",     "status" : "409",     "code" : "ENTITY_ERROR.ATTRIBUTE.TYPE",     "title" : "An attribute in the provided entity has the wrong type",     "detail" : "'IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING' is not a valid value for the attribute 'capabilityType'. Expected one of: 'ICLOUD', 'IN_APP_PURCHASE', 'GAME_CENTER', 'PUSH_NOTIFICATIONS', 'WALLET', 'INTER_APP_AUDIO', 'MAPS', 'ASSOCIATED_DOMAINS', 'PERSONAL_VPN', 'APP_GROUPS', 'HEALTHKIT', 'HOMEKIT', 'WIRELESS_ACCESSORY_CONFIGURATION', 'APPLE_PAY', 'DATA_PROTECTION', 'SIRIKIT', 'NETWORK_EXTENSIONS', 'MULTIPATH', 'HOT_SPOT', 'NFC_TAG_READING', 'CLASSKIT', 'AUTOFILL_CREDENTIAL_PROVIDER', 'ACCESS_WIFI_INFORMATION', 'NETWORK_CUSTOM_PROTOCOL', 'COREMEDIA_HLS_LOW_LATENCY', 'SYSTEM_EXTENSION_INSTALL', 'USER_MANAGEMENT', 'APPLE_ID_AUTH'",     "source" : {       "pointer" : "/data/attributes/capabilityType"     }   } ] } How do we set the In-App Provisioning (IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING) capability type via the Apple API on bundle IDs that have been approved by Wallet Entitlements?

I now had the second user with 26.2. complaining about a hang in my app. The hang occurs when the first AppleScript for Mail is run. Here is the relevant section from the process analysis in Activity Monitor: + 2443 OSACompile (in OpenScripting) + 52 [0x1b32b30f4] + 2443 SecurityPolicyTestDescriptor (in OpenScripting) + 152 [0x1b32a2284] + 2443 _SecurityPolicyTest(char const*, void const*, unsigned long) (in OpenScripting) + 332 [0x1b32a2118] + 2443 InterpreterSecurity_ScanBuffer (in libInterpreterSecurity.dylib) + 112 [0x28c149304] + 2443 -[InterpreterSecurity scanData:withSourceURL:] (in libInterpreterSecurity.dylib) + 164 [0x28c148db4] + 2443 -[XProtectScan beginAnalysisWithFeedback:] (in XprotectFramework) + 544 [0x1d35a1e58] + 2443 -[XPMalwareEvaluation initWithData:assessmentClass:] (in XprotectFramework) + 92 [0x1d359ada4] + 2443 -[XPMalwareEvaluation initWithRuleString:withExtraRules:withURL:withData:withAssessmentClass:feedback:] (in XprotectFramework) + 36 [0x1d359b2a8] My app is correctly signed and notarised. The first user had to completely uninstall/reinstall the app and the everything worked again. Why does this happen? How can the problem be fixed?

Up until some point relatively recently, I have been able to use Safari's web inspector to connect to the iOS simulator in order to debug our web application in development at http://localhost:8088. Now, the web inspector still OPENS, but it opens in a broken state. The context is available to select from Safari's "Develop" menu: Develop > "iPhone 16 Pro (Simulator)" > "localhost - login". It appears under the Safari heading if I have navigated to the web app in the browser, or under the Expo heading if I am accessing it through the webview in our React Native wrapper app. When I select it, the web inspector window does appear. However, once it opens, the Elements pane is empty, the Console pane is empty, expressions entered into the console are not evaluated, there's no content in Sources, Network, Storage, etc. Important notes: This broken state happens at http://localhost:8088 as well as http://127.0.0.1:8088, and it seems that the insecure context is the issue. The web inspector DOES work for HTTPS sites. If I navigate to, e.g., https://example.com in the simulator and connect the web inspector, everything works fine. The web inspector also works fine in Safari on macOS (OUTSIDE the simulator) when accessing non-HTTPS sites. It's only a problem for non-HTTPS sites when connecting to the simulator. A coworker has the same problem, so it is not isolated to my machine. I would enable TLS locally as a workaround, but this web app is very complex, and I know from experience that it is very difficult for various reasons to set it up properly for our project in development, and it will take significant non-trivial work to do so. So... Why is this happening? Is this expected behavior? Is there a way that I can debug my site on localhost without HTTPS?

I have an app that is stuck in "Waiting for review" since January 2nd. This will be one month tomorrow as I'm writing this. It's a totally new app, which I guess could take longer than an update to an existing app, but a month seems a bit much. What can I do about this? It seems weird that there isn't some kind of alarm inside the app review team that will catch some app being stuck for this long...

Hello. I have an 12 year old app that still has some objective-c code in it. I have a place where i have a flip animation between 2 view controllers that looks like this: [UIView transitionFromView:origView toView:newViewController.view duration:0.5 options:UIViewAnimationOptionTransitionFlipFromRight completion:nil]; It has looked like this since 2012 at least. In our production release, it works prior to 26.1, but in 26.1 and 26.2, the flip is off-center and looks weird. it's like both edges flip the same way. It's a little bit hard to explain. If seen at least 2 other app store apps that i have installed behave this way too, from 26.1 and onwards. Anyone else seen this? Is there anything that can be done about it? Thankful for thoughts.

I’m blocked debugging a watchOS app on a physical Apple Watch. The iPhone connects to Xcode normally (wired), but the Watch either fails to connect with a tunnel timeout or disappears entirely from Xcode after I unpaired it inside Devices & Simulators. Environment Mac: macOS 26.x (Apple Silicon Mac) Xcode: 26.2 iPhone: iOS 26.1 Apple Watch Ultra: watchOS 26.2 (build 23S303) Connection: iPhone connected to Mac via USB (trusted). Watch paired to iPhone and working normally in the Watch app. Issue A (when Watch is visible in Xcode) In Xcode → Window → Devices and Simulators, the Watch shows up but is not usable and fails to connect. Error: “Previous preparation error: A connection to this device could not be established.” “Timed out while attempting to establish tunnel using negotiated network parameters.” In some attempts the Watch shows “Capacity: Unknown” / limited details, and then fails during preparation. Issue B (after unpairing Watch in Xcode only) I unpaired/removed the Watch in Xcode (Devices & Simulators). I did not unpair the Watch from the iPhone. Now: iPhone appears in Xcode and works normally for builds. Watch is still paired to the iPhone and works normally. Watch no longer appears anywhere in Xcode Devices & Simulators (no paired watch section, no watch run destination). What I’ve tried Reboots of Mac, iPhone, Watch (multiple times) Watch unlocked, awake; iPhone unlocked and close to Watch Verified Watch is paired and connected in iPhone Watch app Developer Mode enabled on iPhone and Watch Wi-Fi and Bluetooth ON (Mac/iPhone/Watch), tried toggling both Tried on home Wi-Fi and also with iPhone hotspot (same result) Resetting trust prompts / reconnecting iPhone via USB, re-trusting Mac Apple Watch: “Clear Trusted Computers” Xcode: removing/re-adding devices; clearing derived data; restarting Xcode Watch Developer networking test: Responsiveness = Medium (430 RPM) Questions 1. Is this a known issue/regression with Xcode 26.2 + watchOS 26.2 tunneling (CoreDevice / devicectl)? 2. Is there an Apple-supported way to force Xcode to re-discover a paired Watch after it was removed from Xcode Devices & Simulators (without unpairing the Watch from the iPhone)? 3. Any recommended logs or diagnostic steps I should collect (Console logs, sysdiagnose, specific Xcode/CoreDevice logs) to include in a Feedback report? If helpful, I can provide the full error text from Xcode’s Devices window and any logs you recommend. Thank you in advance,

I’m creating a new post because the situation has gone far beyond reasonable. My Apple Developer Program enrollment has been stuck in “Pending” status for almost a month. During this time, I have sent around 10 emails to Apple Developer Program Support. Result: ZERO REPLISES. NO EXPLANATIONS NO UPDATES. NO HELP. If you are experiencing the same issue — or have faced it before — please leave a comment or upvote this thread so it gets visibility. At this point, this seems to be the only way to get Apple’s attention. Apple, this situation needs to be addressed.

Hi, As a company, we have several apps in the AppStore that contain AppClips. With the latest iOS18 it works without any problems. With all iOS26 betas so far, however, there is always the problem “ASDErrorDomain- Error 507” and the AppClip cannot be opened. You can easily test this by scanning the following QR code with the system camera: You only ever get this error instead of the option to open the AppClip. As the iOS26 beta phase is already at an advanced stage, we are naturally concerned as to whether the problem will be solved.

I noticing that Monterey defaults to the NSWindowToolbarStyleAutomatic / NSWindowToolbarStyleUnified toolbar style, which suppresses the "use Small Size" menu item and customization checkbox. So I've set the window to use NSWindowToolbarStyleExpanded. However, the toolbar will no longer change to a smaller icon size, as it did in MacOS 10.14, 10.15, and 11.0. I've tried to set the toolbar item sizing to "Automatic" for all of our toolbar icons, but that results in bad positioning in both Regular and Small Size mode -- the height is way too big. The native size of the icon .png files are 128 x 128. What's odd is that if I resize the window with the toolbar to be wider, the NSToolbarItems in the overflow area will be displayed in the toolbar are 128 x 128, where the rest of the toolbar icons get displayed as a 32 x 32 icon. The only way to get it to layout remotely correct is to make the NSToolbarItem to have an explicit minimum size of 24 x 24 and maximum size of 32 x 32. And that USED to allow "small size", but on Monterey, it no longer does. Anyone had any success with small size icons on Monterey?

Hello, I have noticed a performance drop on SpriteKit-based projects running on iOS 26.3. The issue seems very similar to the issue reported on iOS 26.0, and later solved from iOS 26.2 beta 3: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/800952?answerId=870617022#870617022 With 26.3, it seems a regression occured. Below is the same SpriteKit scene used to test framerate on different devices: import SpriteKit import SwiftUI class BareboneScene: SKScene { override func didMove(to view: SKView) { size = view.bounds.size anchorPoint = CGPoint(x: 0.5, y: 0.5) backgroundColor = .darkGray let roundedSquare = SKShapeNode(rectOf: CGSize(width: 150, height: 75), cornerRadius: 12) roundedSquare.fillColor = .systemRed roundedSquare.strokeColor = .black roundedSquare.lineWidth = 3 addChild(roundedSquare) let action = SKAction.rotate(byAngle: .pi, duration: 1) roundedSquare.run(.repeatForever(action)) } } struct BareboneSceneView: View { var body: some View { SpriteView( scene: BareboneScene(), debugOptions: [.showsFPS] ) .ignoresSafeArea() } } #Preview { BareboneSceneView() } Running this very basic spritekit scene on my device and I can not reach an FPS of 60. Instead, it stalls around 40. I see the same in my AppStore published SpriteKit games. As you can see in the discussion of the linked forum topic, the regression has been noticed by others as well. Can you please look into this, and let us know if there is an outstanding action to resolve it already? It's very problematic for published games suddenly dropping to 40FPS on even the most modern iOS devices.

Hello, I'm struggling trying to interact with a RealityKit entity nested (or at least visually nested) in a second one. I think I've the same issue as mentioned on this StackOverflow post, but I can't manage to reproduce the solution. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79244424/how-to-prioritize-a-specific-entity-when-collision-boxes-overlap-in-realitykit What I'd like to achieve is to translate the red box using a DragGesture, while still be able to interact using a TapGesture on the sphere. Currently, I can only do one at a time. Does anyone know the solution? extension CollisionGroup { static let parent: CollisionGroup = CollisionGroup(rawValue: 1 << 0) static let child: CollisionGroup = CollisionGroup(rawValue: 1 << 1) } struct ImmersiveView: View { var body: some View { RealityView { content in let boxMesh = MeshResource.generateBox(size: 0.35) let boxMaterial = SimpleMaterial(color: .red.withAlphaComponent(0.25), isMetallic: false) let boxEntity = ModelEntity(mesh: boxMesh, materials: [boxMaterial]) let sphereMesh = MeshResource.generateSphere(radius: 0.05) let sphereMaterial = SimpleMaterial(color: .blue, isMetallic: false) let sphereEntity = ModelEntity(mesh: sphereMesh, materials: [sphereMaterial]) content.add(sphereEntity) content.add(boxEntity) boxEntity.components.set(InputTargetComponent()) boxEntity.components.set( CollisionComponent( shapes: [ShapeResource.generateBox(size: SIMD3<Float>(repeating: 0.35))], isStatic: true, filter: CollisionFilter( group: .parent, mask: .parent.subtracting(.child) ) ) ) sphereEntity.components.set(InputTargetComponent()) sphereEntity.components.set(HoverEffectComponent()) sphereEntity.components.set( CollisionComponent( shapes: [ShapeResource.generateSphere(radius: 0.05)], isStatic: true, filter: CollisionFilter( group: .child, mask: .child.subtracting(.parent) ) ) ) } } }

The scenario is, in a macOS app (primarly), main thread needs to wait for some time for a certain 'event'. When that event occurs, the main thread is signaled, it gets unblocked and moves on. An example is, during shutdown, a special thread known as shutdown thread waits for all other worker threads to return (thread join operation). When all threads have returned, the shutdown thread signals the main thread, which was waiting on a timer, to continue with the shutdown flow. If shutdown thread signals the main thread before the later's timer expires, it means all threads have returned. If main thread's timer expires first, it means some threads have failed to join (probably stuck in infinite loop due to bug, disk I/O etc.). This post is to understand how main thread can wait for some time for the shutdown thread. There are two ways: a) dispatch_semaphore_t b) pthread conditional variable (pthread_cond_t) and mutex (pthread_mutex_t). Expanding a bit on option (b) using conditional variable and mutex: // This method is invoked on the main thread bool ConditionSignal::TimedWait() noexcept { struct timespec ts; pthread_mutex_t * mutex = (pthread_mutex_t *) (&vPosix.vMutexStorage[0]); pthread_cond_t * cond = (pthread_cond_t *) (&vPosix.vCondVarStorage[0]); // Set the timer to 3 sec. clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts); ts.tv_sec += 3; pthread_mutex_lock(mutex); LOG("Main thread has acquired the mutex and is waiting!"); int wait_result = pthread_cond_timedwait(cond, mutex, &ts); switch (wait_result) { case 0: LOG("Main thread signaled!"); return true; case ETIMEDOUT: LOG("Main thread's timer expired!"); return false; default: LOG("Error: Unexpected return value from pthread_cond_timedwait: " + std::to_string(wait_result)); break; } return false; } // This method is invoked on shutdown thread after all worker threads have returned. void ConditionSignal::Raise() noexcept { pthread_mutex_t * mutex = (pthread_mutex_t *) (&vPosix.vMutexStorage); pthread_cond_t * cond = (pthread_cond_t *) (&vPosix.vCondVarStorage); pthread_mutex_lock(mutex); LOG("[Shutdown thread]: Signalling main thread..."); pthread_cond_signal(cond); pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex); } Both options allow the main thread to wait for some time (for shutdown thread) and continue execution. However, when using dispatch_semaphore_t, I get the following warning: Thread Performance Checker: Thread running at User-interactive quality-of-service class waiting on a lower QoS thread running at Default quality-of-service class. Investigate ways to avoid priority inversions Whereas, with conditional variables, there are no warnings. I understand the warning - holding the main thread can prevent it from responding to user events, thus causing the app to freeze. And in iOS, the process is killed if main thread takes more than 5 secs to return from applicationWillTerminate(_:) delegate method. But in this scenario, the main thread is on a timed-wait, for some milliseconds i.e., it is guaranteed to not get blocked indefinitely. While this is described for macOS, this functionality is required for all Apple OSes. What is the recommend way?

We are observing some unexpected behavior in our app when using ASK. Our app is able to successfully discover and set up an accessory via ASK. After the setup completes, the connection to the accessory is managed through CBCentralManager and works as expected. However, when we attempt to discover another accessory afterward, the picker is shown and indicates that accessory discovery is in progress. After approximately 10 seconds, the CBCentralManager delegate reports the Bluetooth state as poweredOff. Once this happens, the state never transitions back to poweredOn. At this point, the only way to reconnect to the device or continue discovery is to relaunch the app. We are wondering if anyone else has encountered similar behavior, or if this is a known or documented limitation/behavior when using ASK in combination with CBCentralManager.

"EnableLiveAssetServerV2-com.apple.MobileAsset.MetalToolchain" = on; ProductName: macOS ProductVersion: 26.0.1 BuildVersion: 25A362 The MetalToolchain is installed, however I keep getting error that MetalToolchain cannot be found by the Xcode "Command CompileMetalFile failed with a nonzero exit code" error: error: cannot execute tool 'metal' due to missing Metal Toolchain; use: xcodebuild -downloadComponent MetalToolchain ❯ xcodebuild -downloadComponent MetalToolchain 2025-10-31 11:18:29.004 xcodebuild[6605:45524] IDEDownloadableMetalToolchainCoordinator: Failed to remount the Metal Toolchain: The file “com.apple.MobileAsset.MetalToolchain-v17.1.324.0.k9JmEp” couldn’t be opened because you don’t have permission to view it. Beginning asset download... 2025-10-31 11:18:29.212 xcodebuild[6605:45523] IDEDownloadableMetalToolchainCoordinator: Failed to remount the Metal Toolchain: The file “com.apple.MobileAsset.MetalToolchain-v17.1.324.0.k9JmEp” couldn’t be opened because you don’t have permission to view it. Downloaded asset to: /System/Library/AssetsV2/com_apple_MobileAsset_MetalToolchain/4ab058bc1c53034b8c0a9baca6fba2d2b78bb965.asset/AssetData/Restore/022-17211-415.dmg Done downloading: Metal Toolchain 17A324.